back to top
HomeTechNvidia Is Building NemoClaw, an Open Source AI Agent Platform That Runs...

Nvidia Is Building NemoClaw, an Open Source AI Agent Platform That Runs on Any Chip

NemoClaw launched on March 16 as an early alpha preview. The hardware agnostic promise held up, it runs on Linux, macOS and Windows WSL with Docker. The security layer is real, built on OpenShell with network, filesystem and process isolation. It is not production ready yet but the foundation is solid.

- Advertisement -

The company that sells the chips just built software that runs on everyone else’s chips.

Nvidia is reportedly preparing to launch an open source AI agent platform called NemoClaw at GTC 2026 next week in San Jose. People familiar with the plans say the platform will let enterprise companies deploy AI agents across their workforces regardless of whether they run on Nvidia hardware or not.

Nvidia hasn’t confirmed anything publicly yet. But the conversations with companies like Salesforce, Cisco, Google, Adobe and CrowdStrike are apparently already happening.

So what actually is NemoClaw?

Think of it as a platform that lets companies send AI agents out to do work on behalf of their employees. Not a chatbot you talk to. An agent that actually goes and does things like processing emails, scheduling, pulling data, generating reports, crossing between different software systems & other works.

The difference from what exists today is the security layer. Right now enterprises are terrified of AI agents and honestly for good reason. We’ll get to that in a second.

NemoClaw is open source which means companies aren’t locked into paying Nvidia for access. They get the code, they customize it, they own their deployment. And because it’s hardware agnostic they can run it on whatever infrastructure they already have. AMD, Intel, doesn’t matter.

That last part is the one that keeps coming up in every conversation about this. A chip company releasing software that deliberately works on rival chips is unusual enough to make people stop and ask why.

The answer is probably that Nvidia has decided owning the software layer is worth more than protecting the hardware moat. Jensen Huang’s keynote on March 16 at GTC will likely tell us how serious they are about that bet.

The OpenClaw problem NemoClaw is solving

To understand why enterprises need NemoClaw you have to understand what happened with OpenClaw.

Earlier this year an open source AI agent called OpenClaw took Silicon Valley completely by surprise. It ran locally on your machine, completed work tasks autonomously, and became GitHub’s most starred project faster than anything before it. Developers loved it. Companies started using it. Then things got weird.

Meta told employees to stop using it on work computers. The reason wasn’t complicated — the agents were unpredictable and nobody could fully control what they were doing with company data. Then a Meta employee who works on AI safety publicly shared what happened when she let an agent run on her machine. It went rogue and mass deleted her emails.

That’s not a edge case horror story. That’s a senior AI safety researcher at one of the world’s biggest tech companies losing her emails to an agent she was supposed to understand better than most people.

It gets worse. A security researcher managed to hijack an OpenClaw agent in under two hours.

OpenAI saw the momentum and acquired the project. The creator Peter Steinberger joined Sam Altman’s team. Which means the most popular open source agent in history is now under the control of a closed source company.

Enterprises were left in an awkward spot. They wanted agents. They couldn’t trust the ones that existed. And the most promising one just got acquired.

That’s the gap Nvidia is walking into with NemoClaw.

Also Read: Small But Powerful AI Models You Can Run Locally on Your System

Who Nvidia is talking to?

According to people familiar with the plans, Nvidia has approached Salesforce, Cisco, Google, Adobe and CrowdStrike ahead of the GTC announcement. That’s not a random list. That’s enterprise software, cloud infrastructure, network security, creative tools and cybersecurity all in one conversation.

But None of these companies have confirmed anything. Nvidia didn’t respond to press requests either. So we’re talking about conversations that are reportedly happening, not signed deals.

The open source angle actually explains why. If NemoClaw is truly open source the partnership model probably isn’t about licensing fees. It’s more likely early contributors get free access and influence over the platform’s direction in exchange for building integrations and contributing to the codebase. That’s how most successful open source enterprise plays work.

CrowdStrike being on that list is the most interesting one to me. A cybersecurity company partnering on an AI agent platform that’s specifically being built to address security concerns. That’s either a very smart move or a very convenient story. Probably both.

Why Nvidia is giving away software for free

Here’s something worth thinking about. Nvidia spent years building CUDA, a proprietary software platform that essentially forced every serious AI developer to buy Nvidia hardware. It worked spectacularly. It made them one of the most valuable companies on the planet.

And now they’re building software that runs on their competitors’ chips.

That’s not an accident or a PR move. Google is building TPUs. Amazon has Trainium. Meta is developing its own silicon. Nvidia’s biggest customers are quietly trying to stop needing Nvidia. If that trend continues the hardware moat they built starts to look less permanent.

So the move makes sense. If you can’t guarantee everyone buys your chips forever, become the company that runs the software layer on top of whatever chips exist. Own the agent runtime before Microsoft, Google or Anthropic locks it down first.

It’s honestly a smart pivot. The question is whether they’re early enough to pull it off. The agent space is moving fast and everyone is building in the same direction right now.

The honest take

NemoClaw isn’t released yet. Everything we know comes from people familiar with the plans, not from Nvidia directly. The GTC keynote on March 16 is where we’ll find out if this is as significant as it sounds or another enterprise platform that gets announced and quietly forgotten.

But the context around it is real. Enterprises want agents and can’t trust the ones that exist. OpenClaw went viral, got acquired, and left a security shaped hole in the market. Nvidia has the engineering credibility, the enterprise relationships and now apparently the strategic motivation to fill that gap.

The hardware agnostic part is what I keep coming back to. If that’s genuine and not just marketing language, it changes the conversation completely. An open source agent platform that runs on anything, backed by Nvidia’s infrastructure expertise, with security built in from the start is exactly what enterprises have been asking for.

Whether NemoClaw actually delivers that is a question Jensen Huang’s keynote will start to answer next week.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
DeepSeek-V4 Can Hold Your Entire Codebase in One Context Window and It's Open Source

DeepSeek-V4 Can Hold Your Entire Codebase in One Context Window and It’s Open Source

0
Every developer who has worked with long context models knows the feeling. You paste in your codebase, add your requirements, include some examples, and somewhere around the halfway point the model starts forgetting things it read at the top. You get generic answers. It misses files it already saw. The context window is technically full but the model is functionally half-asleep. This is called the performance cliff and it is the real problem with long context AI, not the number itself. DeepSeek-V4 is making a specific claim here. Not just that it supports 1 million tokens, several models do that now. The claim is that it stays useful across that entire window by fundamentally changing how attention works at scale. In the 1M token setting, V4-Pro requires only 27% of the compute per token and 10% of the KV cache compared to DeepSeek-V3.2. It is MIT licensed. Weights are on HuggingFace right now. And they shipped two models simultaneously, which means there is an actual choice to make depending on what you are building.
mimo v2.5 pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro: A Coding Model Taking On Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.4

0
Peking University gives its computer science students a compiler project every semester. Build a complete SysY compiler in Rust including lexer, parser, abstract syntax tree, IR code generation, assembly backend, performance optimization. The whole thing. Students typically need several weeks. MiMo-V2.5-Pro finished it in 4.3 hours. Perfect score. 233 out of 233 tests passed on a hidden test suite it had never seen. That's a real university project and a model that scored higher than most students who spent weeks on it. Xiaomi built this, which is still a sentence that takes a moment to process. V2.5-Pro is the next step up from MiMo-V2-Flash and its closed source for now, but Xiaomi has confirmed open source is coming for the V2.5 series. What V2.5-Pro adds over Flash is meaningful. Better long-horizon coherence, stronger agentic capabilities, and the ability to sustain complex tasks across more than a thousand tool calls without losing the thread.

Qwen3.6-27B: The Open Source Coding Model That Punches Way Above Its Size

0
There's a quiet assumption baked into how most people think about AI models. Bigger means better. More parameters means more capable. If you want the best results, you run the biggest thing you can afford. Qwen3.6-27B makes that assumption uncomfortable. It's a 27B dense model, fully open source under Apache 2.0, and on agentic coding benchmarks it beats Qwen3.5-397B — a model nearly fifteen times its size — across every major test. That's not a rounding error or a cherry-picked metric. It's a consistent pattern across SWE-Bench, Terminal-Bench, and frontend code generation. This doesn't mean bigger models are dead. It means the gap between what you can run locally and what only clusters could handle a year ago just got a lot narrower.

Don’t miss any Tech Story

Subscribe To Firethering NewsLetter

You Can Unsubscribe Anytime! Read more in our privacy policy