back to top
HomeTechOpenAI Wanted Distribution on the iPhone. Apple Had Other Plans.

OpenAI Wanted Distribution on the iPhone. Apple Had Other Plans.

- Advertisement -

OpenAI was supposed to become part of the iPhone experience. Apple would finally have an AI answer for Siri. ChatGPT would sit in front of hundreds of millions of users.

It didn’t work out that way.

According to Bloomberg, OpenAI has brought in outside legal counsel to explore its options, including a formal breach-of-contract notice against Apple. The integration that was supposed to funnel billions in new subscriptions toward ChatGPT instead got buried deep enough that most iPhone users probably don’t know it exists. One OpenAI executive put it plainly: “They basically said, ‘OpenAI needs to take a leap of faith and trust us.’ It didn’t work out well.”

ChatGPT got onto the iPhone. Almost nobody noticed

When Apple announced the ChatGPT integration at WWDC 2024, it looked like a genuine win for OpenAI. ChatGPT would live inside Siri and power Apple’s Visual Intelligence feature, putting it in front of hundreds of millions of iPhone users by default. For a company that built its growth on web traffic and app downloads, that kind of embedded distribution was hard to pass up.

OpenAI expected billions. The iPhone is the most attractive platform for consumer software growth, and being baked into the operating system is as close to a guaranteed audience as you get. What OpenAI got instead, per Bloomberg, was an integration that was hard to find, features that were difficult to surface, and revenue nowhere near what either side projected.

Apple’s side of it

Apple isn’t sitting quietly either. The company has its own grievances, concerns about OpenAI’s privacy standards, and irritation over OpenAI’s push into hardware, an effort led by former Apple design chief Jony Ive. Apple doesn’t appreciate a partner it helped legitimize turning around and competing in territory Apple considers its own.

You May Like: OpenAI’s Daybreak Wants to Fix Vulnerabilities Before Hackers Exploit Them

The Google move

While OpenAI was waiting for the integration to deliver, Apple was having a different conversation entirely. Earlier this year it struck a separate AI infrastructure deal with Google, paying roughly $1 billion annually to power Apple Intelligence with Gemini models.

Think about what that means for a second. Apple chose to pay its oldest rival a billion dollars a year rather than deepen its relationship with the company already living inside its operating system. OpenAI didn’t get replaced outright, the ChatGPT integration technically still exists but when your partner is cutting nine-figure checks to someone else, the message isn’t subtle.

For Google, it’s a remarkable turnaround. The two companies have been rivals since Android launched in 2008. For Apple, it’s a purely transactional move. Gemini gives them what they need without the complications that apparently came with OpenAI. For OpenAI, it’s the part of this story that stings most.

This isn’t the first time Apple has done this

It’s worth remembering that OpenAI is not the first major software company to learn this lesson the hard way. Google Maps was a flagship feature of the original iPhone. Apple pulled it in 2012, replaced it with its own markedly inferior product, and issued a rare public apology when the fallout was bad enough. Google and Apple eventually found their way back to each other, Google is now paying Apple billions annually to remain the default search engine but the dynamic never really changed. Apple’s platform, Apple’s rules.

Adobe found out too. Steve Jobs refused Flash on the iPhone and iPad, published an open letter explaining why, and Flash never recovered on mobile. Spotify spent years fighting Apple over App Store rules that disadvantaged rival music apps after Apple Music launched, eventually winning a nearly €1.8 billion fine from the European Commission.

The pattern is consistent. Apple embraces partners when it needs them and makes things difficult when it doesn’t.

You May Like: OpenMythos: The Closest Thing to Claude Mythos You Can Run (And It’s Open Source)

Where this leaves OpenAI

Any formal legal action would likely wait until OpenAI’s ongoing trial with Elon Musk concludes. But the mobile distribution problem doesn’t go away in the meantime.

ChatGPT is the most recognized AI brand in the world and it still couldn’t get traction inside the iPhone. That’s the uncomfortable part of all this.

OpenAI is expanding Codex to iOS and Android, building out its own mobile presence the hard way, but getting developers to monitor coding agents remotely is a different challenge than getting everyday iPhone users to reach for ChatGPT over whatever Apple puts in front of them by default.

Apple has the platform. It has Google’s money and Gemini’s models. And it has a long history of making things very difficult for guests who overstay their welcome.

Don’t miss any Tech Story

Subscribe To Firethering NewsLetter

You Can Unsubscribe Anytime! Read more in our privacy policy

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
OpenAI Built Its First AI Chip. It's Not Trying to Replace NVIDIA

OpenAI Built Its First AI Chip. It’s Not Trying to Replace NVIDIA.

0
When the news broke that OpenAI had built a custom chip, the instinct was to frame it as a NVIDIA story. Another lab trying to cut the cord, reduce dependence on H100s, claw back some margin from the company that's been printing money off the AI boom. That's not quite what's happening here. The chip is called Jalapeño, built with Broadcom, and it doesn't touch training at all. It's an inference chip, meaning it only runs models after they're already built, when a user sends a message and ChatGPT has to respond. The compute-heavy work of actually training those models still runs on NVIDIA hardware. OpenAI isn't replacing NVIDIA. It's going after a different part of the problem entirely, the part that happens millions of times a day, every time someone uses one of their products. That distinction matters because inference is where AI costs actually accumulate at scale. Training happens once per model. Inference never stops.
glm 5.2 ai open weights

GLM-5.2 Is the Closest an Open Model Has Come to Claude

0
What does it take for an open-weight model to stop chasing Claude and actually beat it? Every open-weight release for two years has told some version of the same story: closer, but not quite. The chart shrinks, the wording softens to "competitive with," and the conversation moves on until the next model repeats the cycle. GLM-5.2 breaks that pattern. The model is built to survive long, messy coding work, the kind that runs for hours without losing the thread. That's the pitch its maker is leading with. But scroll down their own benchmark table and something else is sitting there quietly: on a couple of standard math evals, this open model isn't approaching Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.5, or Gemini 3.1 Pro. It's beating all three, on the same table. It loses plenty of ground elsewhere, and that part matters just as much as the wins. But a model anyone can download under an MIT license, with no usage restrictions attached, coming out ahead of the lab everyone else measures themselves against, is worth pausing on before getting to what the rest of the numbers actually say.
Open-Source AI Tools Worth Trying Right Now

5 Open-Source AI Tools You Probably Haven’t Tried Yet

0
Every week brings another open source AI release, and most of them require setting up a Python environment. Find out the model card lied about VRAM requirements. By the time something actually runs, the appeal has mostly worn off. The five tools below skip most of that. One turns image and video generation into something closer to a desktop app. One gives DeepSeek an actual workspace instead of a browser tab. One builds UI prototypes using coding agents you probably already have installed. One quietly builds a memory system out of your own apps. And one is, literally, a desktop pet.