back to top
HomeTechAI ModelsLTX 2.3 Is Here: The AI Video Generator That Runs on Your...

LTX 2.3 Is Here: The AI Video Generator That Runs on Your PC and Challenges Veo 3.1

- Advertisement -

Two years ago, if you wanted to generate a decent AI video, the only real option was a subscription. Pick a tool, pay monthly, generate on their servers. That was just how AI video worked.

Open source models eventually closed the gap on quality, but running them locally meant terminals, dependency errors, and a lot of patience. Not everyone wanted that headache. Most people didn’t.

But now that just changed. On March 5th, Lightricks dropped two things at once. LTX 2.3, a major upgrade to their open source video model, and LTX Desktop, a proper video editor built entirely on top of it. Its Open Source & you can install it like any other app on your computer.

If you have the hardware, we’re talking 32GB VRAM for the full experience, you genuinely don’t need a subscription for video generation anymore. Just your GPU doing the work.

And if you’re not there on hardware yet, LTX still offers an API. Paid, but flexible. The point is you have options now.

So What Did Lightricks Actually Build?

Lightricks has been building LTX for a while now. LTX 2 was already turning heads in the open source community, and 2.3 is the most complete version they’ve shipped yet. It’s a diffusion-based video model that generates both video and audio together in a single pass. The sound, the motion & the visuals all come from the same model at the same time. That alone separates it from most of what’s out there.

The base model is 22B parameters and uses Google’s Gemma 3 12B as its text encoder, which is the part that reads your prompt and figures out what to generate. It’s a capable brain for a capable model.

Here’s what actually changed in 2.3.

Sharper output: Lightricks rebuilt the VAE, the part responsible for encoding and decoding visuals. Previous versions softened fine details like hair and edges, especially at lower resolutions. Cleaner textures now, less fixing in post.

Better prompt following: Complex prompts with multiple subjects or specific spatial relationships used to drift from what you asked for. If you’ve been dumbing down your prompts to get consistent results, you can stop.

Image to video that actually moves: Previous versions would often produce a slow pan or freeze entirely when animating a still image. They reworked the training specifically to fix this.

Native portrait video: Vertical resolution up to 1080×1920, trained on actual vertical data. First time in LTX. Relevant if you’re making content for TikTok, Reels, or Shorts.

Cleaner audio: New vocoder, cleaner training data. The audio actually aligns with what’s on screen instead of feeling tacked on.

LTX-Desktop: AI Video Without the Setup

ltx desktop AI video editor

This is where it gets better. LTX-Desktop is a proper video editor built on LTX 2.3 and you install it like any other app.

If you have at least 24GB VRAM, everything runs fully local. Your GPU does the work, simply no cost per generation or if you don’t have the hardware? LTX Desktop connects to their API instead but generation just happens on their servers & its paid.

Either way you’re working inside one app. And if one small detail looks off, the Retake tool lets you fix just that area without regenerating the whole clip. On a paid cloud tool you’d re-roll the entire thing and pay for it. Here you just fix it.

LTX 2.3 vs Veo 3.1

Veo 3.1 is probably the most talked about AI video model right now, so that’s the one worth comparing directly.

MetricLTX 2.3 (Local)LTX 2.3 (API)Veo 3.1 (API)
PriceFree$0.04–$0.24/sec$0.15–$0.60/sec
4K pricingFree (your GPU)$0.16–$0.24/sec$0.35–$0.60/sec
AudioNative, includedNative, includedNative, included
Privacy100% localCloudCloud
Retake/EditYes, in Desktop appYesNo
Open SourceYes YesNo
Runs offlineYesNoNo

Pricing is based on official pages as of March 2026 and may change.

Before You Start Using LTX 2.3

Lightricks recommends a Windows machine with a CUDA GPU and at least 32GB VRAM to run this locally. That’s the honest requirement. Not everyone has that sitting on their desk right now, and that’s fine.

If you’re not there on hardware yet, the API route through LTX Desktop is still a solid option. You get the same editor, the same Retake feature, just without the local generation. When you go through the setup you’ll see the pricing plans and you can pick what works for your usage.

The local route is where the real freedom is. But the API keeps it accessible while you get there.

So, Is LTX 2.3 Worth It?

If you have the hardware, honestly yes. A free, open source video model with native audio, portrait support, a proper desktop app, and no subscription attached to it — that’s not a small thing. Six months ago this combination didn’t exist in open source.

If you don’t have the hardware yet, it’s still worth keeping an eye on. The model is only going to get faster, the community is already building on it, and the API option means you can start using it today without waiting on a GPU upgrade.

Paid tools aren’t going away tomorrow. But they’re going to have a harder time justifying their price tags every time something like this drops.

LTX 2.3 is one of those releases that quietly shifts what people expect for free.

Don’t miss any Tech Story

Subscribe To Firethering NewsLetter

You Can Unsubscribe Anytime! Read more in our privacy policy

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

The Biggest AI Companies Are All Building Their Own Chips. That’s Not a Coincidence.

0
Anthropic confirmed this week it's hiring a custom silicon team to design chips for running Claude. The announcement was quiet a job listing, a spokesperson confirmation, no big launch event. Easy to file under "interesting but expected" and move on. But zoom out for a second. OpenAI shipped its first custom inference chip in June. Google has been running models on its own TPUs for years. Meta has designed and deployed its own silicon. Mistral is reportedly exploring the same path. And now Anthropic. Five of the most important AI labs in the world, all arriving at the same decision, within roughly the same window. None of them are copying each other. All of them looked at the same competitive landscape and reached the same conclusion independently. That kind of convergence doesn't happen by accident. It happens when an entire industry agrees that the thing everyone assumed was someone else's problem is actually the problem and that whoever solves it first has an advantage that's very hard to close later.
AI Was Supposed to Stop Cheating. Instead, 58,000 Students Must Retake Their Exams

AI Was Supposed to Stop Cheating. Instead, 58,000 Students Must Retake Their Exams.

0
UNAM runs the largest university in Mexico. Every year, hundreds of thousands of students take an entrance exam that determines whether they get in. This year, for the first time, the whole thing went remote. They deployed a lockdown browser, AI webcam monitoring, and one human supervisor per 150 applicants. The kind of setup that sounds serious on paper. Then the scores came in. Students hitting 100 or above jumped from 3.5 percent in previous years to 16.3 percent this year. At the very top end, scores of 110 or higher went from 0.9 percent to 5.5 percent. Not a small shift. Not noise. A roughly fivefold increase in top scores, in one year, under one new format. An expert commission investigated. Their conclusion: administer the entire exam again, in person, to around 58,000 people. The rector apologized to students who hadn't cheated. They now have to prepare for and sit another exam anyway.
Claude Chats Ended Up on Google Search. Here's How It Happened

Claude Chats Ended Up on Google Search. Here’s How It Happened.

0
A single line typed into Google was all it took. Type "site:claude.ai/share" into the search bar, and over the weekend, it surfaced a long list of conversations people had shared through Claude, Anthropic's AI chatbot. Not conversations they'd shared with the world on purpose. Conversations they'd shared with one person, or thought they had.Some of what turned up reads like exactly the kind of thing you'd never want indexed anywhere. Medical records. Children's names and phone numbers. Internal company documents marked for employees only. This wasn't a hack, no one broke into anything. It was a feature working exactly as built, surfacing exactly what people had typed into it, in ways most of them almost certainly never intended.