back to top
HomeTechPicksI Thought Figma Was Untouchable — Until This Open-Source AI Tool Designed...

I Thought Figma Was Untouchable — Until This Open-Source AI Tool Designed My UI

- Advertisement -

I’ve used Figma. I’ve used Adobe XD. And for most design work they do the job fine — if you’re okay with paying for them and okay with your files living on someone else’s server.

I wasn’t looking for a replacement. I just stumbled across OpenPencil while browsing GitHub one evening and the one thing that caught my attention wasn’t the canvas or the components. It was the MCP server built directly into the tool.

An AI agent that can read, create and modify your design files from the terminal. That’s not a plugin. That’s a different way of thinking about design tools entirely.

I installed it, connected it to Claude Code, created a sample design and spent some time with it. Here’s what I actually found.

What is OpenPencil (In a Nutshell)

OpenPencil is an open-source design tool built for developers who’d rather type than click. Describe what you want, and the AI breaks it into spatial chunks and generates them in parallel on a canvas, you watch the layout appear rather than build it by hand.

The MCP server is probably the most interesting part. It’s built in, which means Claude Code, Codex, or any MCP-compatible agent can read and modify your design files.

The part that actually got my attention

openpencil app screenshot

You can use it completely offline as a regular design tool — import your Figma files, tweak layouts, adjust components, work with shapes and UI elements manually. No internet needed for that part. It works like any other desktop design app.

But connect it to Claude Code, Codex, Gemini or OpenCode CLI and it becomes something else entirely. You describe what you want — a login form, a dashboard layout, a settings page — and the AI agent generates it directly on the canvas. You can then manually adjust whatever it gets wrong, which in my experience is always something small.

The part I found genuinely interesting is how it saves files. Everything exports as a .op file. Open it in any text editor and it’s just JSON — clean, readable, Git friendly. No proprietary binary format, no locked ecosystem. Your designs are just data you actually own.

That combination of offline capable, agent powered when you want it, open file format, is what makes it powerful.

How it compares to Figma

I went further and actually compared it against Figma since that’s what most people use.

FeatureFigmaOpenPencil
Price$16-90/month per seatFree to use
Open sourceNoYes (MIT)
AI built in nativelyPaid AI credits onlyYes via CLI agents
MCP serverNoBuilt in
Figma file importN/AYes (.fig files)
Code exportDev seat required ($12-35/mo)React, Tailwind, HTML free
File formatProprietary.op (JSON, Git friendly)
Works offlineYesYes for manual design
Self hostableNoYes
Desktop appYesYes (Mac, Windows, Linux)

The number that stood out to me was the Dev seat on Figma, $12/month on Professional, $35/month on Organization, just to inspect code and hand off to developers. OpenPencil generates React, Tailwind and HTML directly at no extra cost.

One thing worth being honest about is OpenPencil isn’t completely free if you want the AI features. You’ll need an active subscription or API access with Claude, Codex, Gemini or OpenCode to use the agent capabilities. But if you already have a plan with any of those providers, you’re not paying anything extra. You’re just plugging in what you already use.

For solo developers or small teams who just need a design tool that talks to their existing AI setup, the cost difference is still hard to ignore.

A few things to know before you try it

First thing you’ll hit, the AI agent features don’t just work out of the box. You need the CLI installed separately first. Claude Code CLI, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI or OpenCode CLI depending on which provider you use. The app tells you clearly when something’s missing but it’s worth knowing before you go in expecting instant AI generation.

The AI features also need internet. If you’re using Claude or Codex for generation you’re still making API calls to cloud servers. The offline part is only for manual design work — shapes, layouts, components, Figma imports. Fully local AI generation isn’t there yet.

Collaborative editing is still on the roadmap. So if you’re expecting a drop-in Figma replacement for a team that works together in real time, this isn’t that yet. It’s currently better suited for solo developers or designers working independently.

Boolean operations — union, subtract, intersect — are also not available yet. For complex vector work that’s a real gap.

It’s a young project. MIT licensed, still actively building. The bones are solid but some features that feel standard in mature design tools are still coming.

None of this is a dealbreaker depending on what you need it for. Just worth knowing upfront.

Closing Thoughts

If you’re a developer who already has Claude or Codex in your workflow, the idea of a design tool that speaks the same language — MCP, agents, code export — is genuinely interesting. I hadn’t seen that combination in an open source tool before.

Import your Figma files, connect your existing AI setup, export clean React and Tailwind. For personal projects or solo work that’s a pretty compelling package.

It’s early. But early is when it’s worth paying attention.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
MiniMax M3 Shows What Happens When AI Stops Thinking in Turns

MiniMax M3 Shows What Happens When AI Stops Thinking in Turns

0
Most models quit around submission 30 because they stop finding improvement and exit on their own. That's what happened when MiniMax ran a CUDA kernel optimization task against a field of frontier models. Every model except two called it done within the first 30 submissions. M3's best result came on submission 145. After 24 hours. After multiple plateaus where the numbers stopped moving and a reasonable model would have concluded there was nothing left to find. That's the thing MiniMax released yesterday. An AI model with a 1M token context window, native multimodality, and apparently a problem with knowing when to stop.
Anthropic Files for an IPO. AI Is Entering Its Public Company Era

Anthropic Files for an IPO. AI Is Entering Its Public Company Era.

0
Anthropic has officially taken its first step toward becoming a public company. In a brief announcement on Monday, the company said it had confidentially submitted a draft S-1 registration statement to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for a proposed initial public offering. The filing doesn't reveal a share price, a fundraising target, or even a timeline. For now, it simply gives Anthropic the option to go public once the SEC review process is complete. Just a few years ago, Anthropic was a small group of former OpenAI researchers trying to build an alternative vision for advanced AI. Today, it sits among the handful of companies shaping the industry's future and that's why this filing matters. It's one of the world's most influential AI labs beginning the transition from a privately funded research company to a business that may eventually answer to public shareholders. For most of the AI boom, the biggest bets were made behind closed doors. Venture firms, sovereign wealth funds, and tech giants supplied the capital while the public watched from the outside. Anthropic's filing suggests that era may be starting to change.

OpenAI Says Its AI Solved an 80-Year-Old Math Problem. The Proof Surprised Mathematicians.

0
OpenAI says one of its internal reasoning models has solved a math problem that has been there on mathematicians' desks since 1946. The problem, first posed by legendary mathematician Paul Erdős, looks almost absurdly simple. Given a set of points on a flat plane, how many pairs can be exactly one unit apart? People have spent nearly 80 years trying to pin down the answer. OpenAI's model didn't just make progress on the problem. According to the company, it disproved a longstanding conjecture that many researchers believed was essentially correct.

Don’t miss any Tech Story

Subscribe To Firethering NewsLetter

You Can Unsubscribe Anytime! Read more in our privacy policy