back to top
HomeTechPicksI Use Claude Code But Not for My Personal Projects — Here's...

I Use Claude Code But Not for My Personal Projects — Here’s What I Use Instead

- Advertisement -

I like Claude Code. But for some of my personal projects, the last thing I want is my code touching a cloud server I don’t control. So I went looking for an open source alternative and found this absolute beast.

It’s called Goose. Honestly surprised it took me this long to find it.

So what is Goose exactly?

goose ai coding

Think of it as an AI agent that lives on your machine. Not a chatbot that gives you code suggestions. An actual agent that can create files, edit code, run commands, debug errors, and work through multi-step tasks on its own.

The part that makes it different from most AI coding tools is the model flexibility. Goose doesn’t care what LLM you use. Connect it to Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, Groq or if you want everything fully local with zero internet, plug in an Ollama model like GLM-5 or Kimi K2. Your choice, your data.

How it’s different from Claude Code

Claude Code is built around Anthropic’s own models and needs an account to run even with local models. Goose has none of that, its fully open source, no account needed. The difference seems small. In practice for personal projects it changes everything.

FeatureClaude CodeGoose
Requires accountYesNo
Fully local optionPartialYes
Model flexibilityLimitedAny LLM or Ollama
Open sourceNoYes (Apache 2.0)
Approval gatesYesMinimal
Internet requiredYesOnly if using cloud models
Desktop appYesYes
CLI supportYesYes
CostPaidFree

Your model, your choice

Goose doesn’t care what model you use. Connect it to Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, or Groq if you want cloud performance. Or point it at a local Ollama model if you want everything staying on your machine. Both work. It just depends on your hardware and what you actually need from the session.

I personally use GLM-5 for most of my personal projects. Is it as good as Claude Opus? No. But it’s good enough for what I’m building, it runs locally, and my code never leaves my machine. That tradeoff works for me.

The part I actually appreciate though is how easy it is to switch. If I hit something complex that needs heavier reasoning I just change the model in settings and keep going. No reinstalling, no reconfiguring, no starting over. Same session, different model.

That kind of flexibility is rare in coding tools. Most lock you in. Goose just gets out of the way.

Getting started is simpler than you think

Goose installs like any normal app, download the binary for your system, open it, connect your model of choice and you’re running. Desktop app if you prefer a visual interface, CLI if you like staying in the terminal. Both work the same way.

Why I chose Goose for personal projects

Simple reason. I didn’t want my code leaving my system. I just have projects where the idea itself is something I want to keep to myself until it’s ready. That’s it.

Goose gives me that. My code stays on my machine, my ideas stay in my head, and I still get an AI agent that can actually work through problems autonomously.

Everyone has their own reasons for caring about this. Maybe it’s a client project with an NDA. Maybe it’s something you’re building that you don’t want anyone seeing yet. Maybe you just like knowing exactly where your data goes.

Whatever the reason, if you’ve been looking for an open source alternative to Claude Code that actually works, this one is worth trying.

Want more stories worth your time?

Add us to your Google favorites. We cover the tech stories, AI developments, and open-source projects that are easy to miss in the noise.

Add as a preferred source on Google

Don’t miss any Tech Story

Subscribe To Firethering NewsLetter

You Can Unsubscribe Anytime! Read more in our privacy policy

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
AI Leaders Finally Want to Slow the AI Race. Can They Actually Do It

Everyone Agrees the AI Race Needs to Slow Down. But Can Anyone Do It?

0
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei says frontier AI needs to be paced, and Sam Altman agrees. But can companies and countries actually slow the AI race?
Anthropic Researchers Fear the AI Race Could Cause Human Extinction

Anthropic Researchers Fear the AI Race Could Cause Human Extinction

0
An Anthropic researcher just resigned because he believes the AI race could end in human extinction. Jacob Coxon spent three years working on pretraining research at OpenAI and Anthropic. In his resignation post, he accused both companies of racing toward self-improving superintelligence while gambling with consequences that could affect everyone. That alone would make for a remarkable resignation. Then Evan Hubinger joined the conversation. Hubinger leads Alignment Science at Anthropic. He publicly agreed with Coxon's warning and said researchers at the company genuinely believe AI could kill all humans. He also made a much more uncomfortable admission: Anthropic is trying to solve the problem, but he doesn't believe they yet have a plan for aligning superintelligence, or that they're clearly on track to do it. So why keep building? The answer has less to do with whether these researchers understand the risks and more to do with what happens when every major lab knows the others are still moving forward. To see why that can become a trap, we first need to understand what they're actually worried about.
Tired of Being a Tenant in Your Own PC? These 7 Open Source Tools Give You Back Control

Tired of Being a Tenant in Your Own PC? These 7 Open Source Tools...

0
Tired of feeling like a tenant on your own PC? These 7 open source tools add missing features of your OS, fix everyday annoyances and give you more control.