back to top
HomeTechPicksI Use Claude Code But Not for My Personal Projects — Here's...

I Use Claude Code But Not for My Personal Projects — Here’s What I Use Instead

- Advertisement -

I like Claude Code. But for some of my personal projects, the last thing I want is my code touching a cloud server I don’t control. So I went looking for an open source alternative and found this absolute beast.

It’s called Goose. Honestly surprised it took me this long to find it.

So what is Goose exactly?

goose ai coding

Think of it as an AI agent that lives on your machine. Not a chatbot that gives you code suggestions. An actual agent that can create files, edit code, run commands, debug errors, and work through multi-step tasks on its own.

The part that makes it different from most AI coding tools is the model flexibility. Goose doesn’t care what LLM you use. Connect it to Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, Groq or if you want everything fully local with zero internet, plug in an Ollama model like GLM-5 or Kimi K2. Your choice, your data.

How it’s different from Claude Code

Claude Code is built around Anthropic’s own models and needs an account to run even with local models. Goose has none of that, its fully open source, no account needed. The difference seems small. In practice for personal projects it changes everything.

FeatureClaude CodeGoose
Requires accountYesNo
Fully local optionPartialYes
Model flexibilityLimitedAny LLM or Ollama
Open sourceNoYes (Apache 2.0)
Approval gatesYesMinimal
Internet requiredYesOnly if using cloud models
Desktop appYesYes
CLI supportYesYes
CostPaidFree

Your model, your choice

Goose doesn’t care what model you use. Connect it to Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, or Groq if you want cloud performance. Or point it at a local Ollama model if you want everything staying on your machine. Both work. It just depends on your hardware and what you actually need from the session.

I personally use GLM-5 for most of my personal projects. Is it as good as Claude Opus? No. But it’s good enough for what I’m building, it runs locally, and my code never leaves my machine. That tradeoff works for me.

The part I actually appreciate though is how easy it is to switch. If I hit something complex that needs heavier reasoning I just change the model in settings and keep going. No reinstalling, no reconfiguring, no starting over. Same session, different model.

That kind of flexibility is rare in coding tools. Most lock you in. Goose just gets out of the way.

Getting started is simpler than you think

Goose installs like any normal app, download the binary for your system, open it, connect your model of choice and you’re running. Desktop app if you prefer a visual interface, CLI if you like staying in the terminal. Both work the same way.

Why I chose Goose for personal projects

Simple reason. I didn’t want my code leaving my system. I just have projects where the idea itself is something I want to keep to myself until it’s ready. That’s it.

Goose gives me that. My code stays on my machine, my ideas stay in my head, and I still get an AI agent that can actually work through problems autonomously.

Everyone has their own reasons for caring about this. Maybe it’s a client project with an NDA. Maybe it’s something you’re building that you don’t want anyone seeing yet. Maybe you just like knowing exactly where your data goes.

Whatever the reason, if you’ve been looking for an open source alternative to Claude Code that actually works, this one is worth trying.

Don’t miss any Tech Story

Subscribe To Firethering NewsLetter

You Can Unsubscribe Anytime! Read more in our privacy policy

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Google Built Gemma 4 12B Without Multimodal Encoders

Google Built Gemma 4 12B Without Multimodal Encoders

0
Every multimodal model you've used has the same basic system. Text goes in one way, images go through a vision encoder first, audio goes through an audio encoder first, and then everything gets handed off to the language model in a form it can work with. The encoders are load-bearing and you don't just remove them.Google actually removed them.Gemma 4 12B takes raw image patches and raw audio waveforms and projects them directly into the same embedding space as text tokens. There is no vision encoder or audio encoder. One decoder handling everything.
MiniMax M3 Shows What Happens When AI Stops Thinking in Turns

MiniMax M3 Shows What Happens When AI Stops Thinking in Turns

0
Most models quit around submission 30 because they stop finding improvement and exit on their own. That's what happened when MiniMax ran a CUDA kernel optimization task against a field of frontier models. Every model except two called it done within the first 30 submissions. M3's best result came on submission 145. After 24 hours. After multiple plateaus where the numbers stopped moving and a reasonable model would have concluded there was nothing left to find. That's the thing MiniMax released yesterday. An AI model with a 1M token context window, native multimodality, and apparently a problem with knowing when to stop.
Anthropic Files for an IPO. AI Is Entering Its Public Company Era

Anthropic Files for an IPO. AI Is Entering Its Public Company Era.

0
Anthropic has officially taken its first step toward becoming a public company. In a brief announcement on Monday, the company said it had confidentially submitted a draft S-1 registration statement to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for a proposed initial public offering. The filing doesn't reveal a share price, a fundraising target, or even a timeline. For now, it simply gives Anthropic the option to go public once the SEC review process is complete. Just a few years ago, Anthropic was a small group of former OpenAI researchers trying to build an alternative vision for advanced AI. Today, it sits among the handful of companies shaping the industry's future and that's why this filing matters. It's one of the world's most influential AI labs beginning the transition from a privately funded research company to a business that may eventually answer to public shareholders. For most of the AI boom, the biggest bets were made behind closed doors. Venture firms, sovereign wealth funds, and tech giants supplied the capital while the public watched from the outside. Anthropic's filing suggests that era may be starting to change.