back to top
HomeTechChatGPT Wants Access to Your Bank Account

ChatGPT Wants Access to Your Bank Account

- Advertisement -

OpenAI did this with your health data in January. Now it wants your financial data too.

The company announced today that ChatGPT users can connect their bank accounts through Plaid, the financial bridging platform used by 12,000 institutions including Chase, Fidelity, Capital One, and Schwab. Once connected, ChatGPT gets a full view of your balances, transaction history, active subscriptions, investment portfolio, and liabilities like mortgages and credit card debt. In return you get a spending dashboard, personalized financial advice, and a chatbot that can flag unusual changes in your habits.

It’s launching in preview for Pro subscribers at $200 a month. OpenAI says Plus and eventually everyone else comes later.

What it can do and what it can’t

via OpenAI

OpenAI is careful about framing the boundaries. ChatGPT cannot make changes to your accounts or see full account numbers. Users can disconnect at any time, delete saved financial memories, and opt out of having their data used for model training.

What it can see is everything else. Your balance. Every transaction. Your stock portfolio. What you owe. And once connected, OpenAI has up to 30 days to delete your data after you disconnect which means pulling the plug isn’t quite as clean as it sounds.

The training opt-in is worth reading carefully too. The default isn’t entirely clear, and “Improve the model for everyone” as the label for sharing your financial data with OpenAI’s training pipeline is doing a lot of friendly framing around a significant decision.

You May Like: OpenAI Wanted Distribution on the iPhone. Apple Had Other Plans.

The pattern

In January OpenAI launched ChatGPT Health, a feature that let users connect medical records for health-related questions. The company was careful to note it wasn’t intended for diagnosis or treatment. The privacy questions that followed, what does OpenAI actually do with this data, how is it protected, what happens if there’s a breach were never fully answered.

Now the same playbook, with your bank account. OpenAI says users have control over their data. What the company doesn’t specify is what OpenAI itself does with that financial information beyond AI training, or whether any additional protections exist against a system breach. That’s the part people are going to keep asking about.

What happens to all this data later

OpenAI is a company that, by its own admission, eventually needs to turn a profit. It now has the potential to build a detailed financial profile of millions of users, spending habits, debt levels, investment behavior, subscription patterns, income signals buried in transaction history.

That’s an extraordinarily valuable dataset. The announcement doesn’t address what guardrails exist around it commercially, what happens to that data if OpenAI’s business model shifts, or what protections survive a potential acquisition or restructuring down the line.

Connecting your bank account to ChatGPT might be genuinely useful. The spending dashboard is a real feature. The financial advice could be good. But OpenAI has now collected your health data and your financial data without clearly answering what a company under commercial pressure does with either of them long term.

Want more stories worth your time?

Add us to your Google favorites. We cover the tech stories, AI developments, and open-source projects that are easy to miss in the noise.

Add as a preferred source on Google

Don’t miss any Tech Story

Subscribe To Firethering NewsLetter

You Can Unsubscribe Anytime! Read more in our privacy policy

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Anthropic Researchers Fear the AI Race Could Cause Human Extinction

Anthropic Researchers Fear the AI Race Could Cause Human Extinction

0
An Anthropic researcher just resigned because he believes the AI race could end in human extinction. Jacob Coxon spent three years working on pretraining research at OpenAI and Anthropic. In his resignation post, he accused both companies of racing toward self-improving superintelligence while gambling with consequences that could affect everyone. That alone would make for a remarkable resignation. Then Evan Hubinger joined the conversation. Hubinger leads Alignment Science at Anthropic. He publicly agreed with Coxon's warning and said researchers at the company genuinely believe AI could kill all humans. He also made a much more uncomfortable admission: Anthropic is trying to solve the problem, but he doesn't believe they yet have a plan for aligning superintelligence, or that they're clearly on track to do it. So why keep building? The answer has less to do with whether these researchers understand the risks and more to do with what happens when every major lab knows the others are still moving forward. To see why that can become a trap, we first need to understand what they're actually worried about.
Tired of Being a Tenant in Your Own PC? These 7 Open Source Tools Give You Back Control

Tired of Being a Tenant in Your Own PC? These 7 Open Source Tools...

0
Tired of feeling like a tenant on your own PC? These 7 open source tools add missing features of your OS, fix everyday annoyances and give you more control.
OpenAI's Agents Didn’t Escape. They Turned a Read-Only Web Access Into a Message Board

OpenAI’s Agents Didn’t Escape. They Turned a Read-Only Web Access Into a Message Board.

0
OpenAI agents used a German wiki to share information and bypass read-only restrictions, revealing an unexpected gap in their sandbox.