back to top
HomeTechPicksI Thought Figma Was Untouchable — Until This Open-Source AI Tool Designed...

I Thought Figma Was Untouchable — Until This Open-Source AI Tool Designed My UI

- Advertisement -

I’ve used Figma. I’ve used Adobe XD. And for most design work they do the job fine — if you’re okay with paying for them and okay with your files living on someone else’s server.

I wasn’t looking for a replacement. I just stumbled across OpenPencil while browsing GitHub one evening and the one thing that caught my attention wasn’t the canvas or the components. It was the MCP server built directly into the tool.

An AI agent that can read, create and modify your design files from the terminal. That’s not a plugin. That’s a different way of thinking about design tools entirely.

I installed it, connected it to Claude Code, created a sample design and spent some time with it. Here’s what I actually found.

What is OpenPencil (In a Nutshell)

OpenPencil is an open-source design tool built for developers who’d rather type than click. Describe what you want, and the AI breaks it into spatial chunks and generates them in parallel on a canvas, you watch the layout appear rather than build it by hand.

The MCP server is probably the most interesting part. It’s built in, which means Claude Code, Codex, or any MCP-compatible agent can read and modify your design files.

The part that actually got my attention

openpencil app screenshot

You can use it completely offline as a regular design tool — import your Figma files, tweak layouts, adjust components, work with shapes and UI elements manually. No internet needed for that part. It works like any other desktop design app.

But connect it to Claude Code, Codex, Gemini or OpenCode CLI and it becomes something else entirely. You describe what you want — a login form, a dashboard layout, a settings page — and the AI agent generates it directly on the canvas. You can then manually adjust whatever it gets wrong, which in my experience is always something small.

The part I found genuinely interesting is how it saves files. Everything exports as a .op file. Open it in any text editor and it’s just JSON — clean, readable, Git friendly. No proprietary binary format, no locked ecosystem. Your designs are just data you actually own.

That combination of offline capable, agent powered when you want it, open file format, is what makes it powerful.

How it compares to Figma

I went further and actually compared it against Figma since that’s what most people use.

FeatureFigmaOpenPencil
Price$16-90/month per seatFree to use
Open sourceNoYes (MIT)
AI built in nativelyPaid AI credits onlyYes via CLI agents
MCP serverNoBuilt in
Figma file importN/AYes (.fig files)
Code exportDev seat required ($12-35/mo)React, Tailwind, HTML free
File formatProprietary.op (JSON, Git friendly)
Works offlineYesYes for manual design
Self hostableNoYes
Desktop appYesYes (Mac, Windows, Linux)

The number that stood out to me was the Dev seat on Figma, $12/month on Professional, $35/month on Organization, just to inspect code and hand off to developers. OpenPencil generates React, Tailwind and HTML directly at no extra cost.

One thing worth being honest about is OpenPencil isn’t completely free if you want the AI features. You’ll need an active subscription or API access with Claude, Codex, Gemini or OpenCode to use the agent capabilities. But if you already have a plan with any of those providers, you’re not paying anything extra. You’re just plugging in what you already use.

For solo developers or small teams who just need a design tool that talks to their existing AI setup, the cost difference is still hard to ignore.

A few things to know before you try it

First thing you’ll hit, the AI agent features don’t just work out of the box. You need the CLI installed separately first. Claude Code CLI, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI or OpenCode CLI depending on which provider you use. The app tells you clearly when something’s missing but it’s worth knowing before you go in expecting instant AI generation.

The AI features also need internet. If you’re using Claude or Codex for generation you’re still making API calls to cloud servers. The offline part is only for manual design work — shapes, layouts, components, Figma imports. Fully local AI generation isn’t there yet.

Collaborative editing is still on the roadmap. So if you’re expecting a drop-in Figma replacement for a team that works together in real time, this isn’t that yet. It’s currently better suited for solo developers or designers working independently.

Boolean operations — union, subtract, intersect — are also not available yet. For complex vector work that’s a real gap.

It’s a young project. MIT licensed, still actively building. The bones are solid but some features that feel standard in mature design tools are still coming.

None of this is a dealbreaker depending on what you need it for. Just worth knowing upfront.

Closing Thoughts

If you’re a developer who already has Claude or Codex in your workflow, the idea of a design tool that speaks the same language — MCP, agents, code export — is genuinely interesting. I hadn’t seen that combination in an open source tool before.

Import your Figma files, connect your existing AI setup, export clean React and Tailwind. For personal projects or solo work that’s a pretty compelling package.

It’s early. But early is when it’s worth paying attention.

Want more stories worth your time?

Add us to your Google favorites. We cover the tech stories, AI developments, and open-source projects that are easy to miss in the noise.

Add as a preferred source on Google

Don’t miss any Tech Story

Subscribe To Firethering NewsLetter

You Can Unsubscribe Anytime! Read more in our privacy policy

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
AI Leaders Finally Want to Slow the AI Race. Can They Actually Do It

Everyone Agrees the AI Race Needs to Slow Down. But Can Anyone Do It?

0
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei says frontier AI needs to be paced, and Sam Altman agrees. But can companies and countries actually slow the AI race?
Anthropic Researchers Fear the AI Race Could Cause Human Extinction

Anthropic Researchers Fear the AI Race Could Cause Human Extinction

0
An Anthropic researcher just resigned because he believes the AI race could end in human extinction. Jacob Coxon spent three years working on pretraining research at OpenAI and Anthropic. In his resignation post, he accused both companies of racing toward self-improving superintelligence while gambling with consequences that could affect everyone. That alone would make for a remarkable resignation. Then Evan Hubinger joined the conversation. Hubinger leads Alignment Science at Anthropic. He publicly agreed with Coxon's warning and said researchers at the company genuinely believe AI could kill all humans. He also made a much more uncomfortable admission: Anthropic is trying to solve the problem, but he doesn't believe they yet have a plan for aligning superintelligence, or that they're clearly on track to do it. So why keep building? The answer has less to do with whether these researchers understand the risks and more to do with what happens when every major lab knows the others are still moving forward. To see why that can become a trap, we first need to understand what they're actually worried about.
Tired of Being a Tenant in Your Own PC? These 7 Open Source Tools Give You Back Control

Tired of Being a Tenant in Your Own PC? These 7 Open Source Tools...

0
Tired of feeling like a tenant on your own PC? These 7 open source tools add missing features of your OS, fix everyday annoyances and give you more control.