back to top
HomeTechPicks5 Open-Source Discord Alternatives That Don’t Care Who You Are

5 Open-Source Discord Alternatives That Don’t Care Who You Are

Looking for a privacy-focused Discord alternative? These open-source platforms offer voice, chat, and community features without the lock-in.

- Advertisement -

Discord has been catching heat over its new verification rules. You’ve probably seen the threads everywhere.

At some point I stopped scrolling and asked myself, Why does hanging out with friends online suddenly feel like paperwork?

So I started looking for better alternatives to discord that don’t care who you are. They respect your privacy and still deliver a Discord-level experience.

Some are great for gamers who want low-latency voice and familiar server layouts. Others are better for smaller communities that want tighter control or even self-hosting

instead of ranking them from best to worst, I’ve grouped them by what they’re actually good at.

1. Stoat

Stoat Open Source Alternative to Discord

In my search for the best Discord alternatives, Stoat was one of the first platforms I actually signed up for and tested properly.

And honestly? The layout is very Discord-like, servers on the left, channels in the middle, chat on the right. it feels Less bloated.

Stoat is fully open-source and community-driven. There are no No ads or trackers. It just feels like a chat app built for communities..

Features of Stoat

  • Servers with channels and role-based permissions
  • Direct messages and group chats
  • Voice chat support
  • File and image sharing
  • Bot support

What It Doesn’t Do (Yet)

  • The user base is still small
  • Fewer bots and integrations compared to Discord
  • Does’t support video calling or screen sharing (yet).

Best For

  • Smaller communities that value privacy and control
  • Gamers who want something that feels like Discord

If you’re interested in knowing more about Stoat, I’ve written a detailed article on Is Stoat The New Discord?

2. Fluxer

Fluxer Open Source Alternative

Fluxer surprised me. It felt more complete than I expected especially for something fully open source.

It’s free to use, and you can even try it in your browser without giving up your email. That alone lowers the barriers.

Interface-wise, it feels modern. DMs, group chats, channels, all where you expect them. Voice and video work out of the box & Screen sharing is built in.

You can use it casually with friends, or go deeper and self-host your own backend if you want full ownership.

It’s one of the few open-source chat apps that feels ready for everyday use.

Features of Fluxers

  • DMs, group chats, and community channels
  • Voice, video calls, and built-in screen sharing
  • Noise suppression and echo cancellation
  • Full Markdown support
  • Granular roles and moderation tools
  • Message search and quick channel switcher
  • Custom emojis and custom CSS themes
  • Self-hosting support (AGPLv3)

What It Doesn’t Do (Yet)

  • Smaller ecosystem compared to Discord
  • Mobile app still developing
  • Fewer third-party integrations
  • Community discovery isn’t as strong as larger platforms

Best For

  • Small to mid-sized communities
  • Friends who want voice, video, and screen sharing without relying on Discord
  • Users who may eventually want to self-host

3. Cinny

Cinny Discord Alternative

Cinny isn’t its own chat network. It’s a client built on top of Matrix, which means your conversations don’t live on one company’s servers. Matrix is decentralized and built around secure, encrypted communication.

The first thing I noticed about Cinny wasn’t the tech, though. It was the interface.

It’s clean & Minimal without feeling empty. DMs are separated from channels. Navigation feels organized. And yes it has end-to-end encryption (E2EE)

That said, Cinny is more “power user” than plug-and-play. If you’ve never used Matrix before, there’s a small learning curve.

Features of Cinny

  • Built on the decentralized Matrix network
  • End-to-end encrypted conversations
  • Clean, modern interface
  • DMs separated from channels for better organization

What It Doesn’t Do (Yet)

  • Smaller public communities than mainstream platforms
  • Voice and large-scale community features aren’t as flexible as Discord

Best For

  • Privacy-focused users who want decentralization
  • Developers and tech-savvy communities
  • People who care more about control than convenience

Also Read: 5 Open-Source AI Music Generators That Create Studio-Quality Songs

4. Rocket.chat

Rocket Chat

This isn’t just a Discord alternative for friend groups. It’s used by critical infrastructure teams. That alone tells you what kind of platform this is.

It gives you far more say over how your community runs. Moderation tools are stronger. Permissions are more granular. You can lock things down or open them up exactly how you want.

The interface is more professional rather than gamer-friendly. But for communities that want long-term reliability, that’s not a bad thing.

Features of Rocket.chat

  • Channels, DMs, and threaded conversations
  • Voice and video calls
  • Strong moderation and role controls
  • Searchable message history
  • Integrations and extensibility
  • Open-source core

What It Doesn’t Do As Well

Interface feels more work-focused than fun

  • Slightly heavier to set up than plug-and-play apps
  • Some advanced features are tied to paid plans
  • Not as socially “lively” as Discord

Best For

  • Structured communities that want tighter moderation
  • Study groups, professional circles, and organized communities
  • Users who want Discord-like features with more control

Also Read: Top 7 AI Image Generators You Can Run on Consumer GPUs

5. Element

Element Discord Alternative

Element is one of the most established clients built on top of the Matrix network. If you’ve heard of Matrix before, chances are you’ve heard of Element too.

Using it feels more structured than Discord. Conversations are organized, encryption is strong, and everything runs on a decentralized network rather than a single company’s servers.

You can use it straight from your browser, install the desktop app, or grab the mobile version. For most users, it’s just: sign up, join a server (called “rooms” in Matrix), and start chatting.

That said, it does feel more secure messaging platform than hang out and game. It’s built with privacy and interoperability in mind first, fun second.

Features of Element

  • Built on the decentralized Matrix network
  • End-to-end encrypted messaging
  • Browser, desktop, and mobile apps
  • Cross-platform syncing
  • Strong security and compliance focus
  • Open-source and actively maintained

What It Doesn’t Do As Well

  • Slight learning curve compared to Discord
  • Interface feels more productivity-focused than social
  • Voice/video isn’t as smooth as Discord’s native experience

Best For

  • Teams that want secure messaging without vendor lock-in
  • Users who want a mature, privacy-first alternative
  • Tech-savvy communities already exploring Matrix

Wrapping Up

You don’t need to prove who you are to join a conversation.

If Discord still works for you, great. If it doesn’t, these five platforms prove something important: community doesn’t require surrendering control. The choice is yours.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Why Google and Anthropic Are Banning OpenClaw Users 4 Reasons Behind the Crackdown

Google and Anthropic Are Banning OpenClaw Users: 4 Reasons Behind the Crackdown

0
You know something's wrong when companies start banning their own paying customers without explanation. Last week, Google restricted access for some AI Ultra users (those paying $250/month). Anthropic made similar moves with Claude Pro subscribers around the same time. The connection? Both were targeting people using OpenClaw. OpenClaw, if you haven't heard of it, is this third-party tool that turns AI chatbots into automation agents. Instead of just asking Claude questions, you can have it control your computer, run tasks, fill out forms—stuff like that. Developers loved it. Until both companies suddenly decided it violated their terms of service. What's frustrating is how vague both companies have been about the actual reasons. Google cited "misuse of OAuth authentication." Anthropic updated its terms to prohibit third-party "harnesses." But neither explained what specific security issues, if any, triggered the sudden enforcement. I started digging into what might be behind the crackdown. Some security researchers have raised concerns about how OpenClaw handles permissions and credentials. There are questions about the plugin ecosystem. And there's been discussion in developer communities about whether the tool's architecture creates risks that the AI companies couldn't ignore. So here's what we know, what's still unclear, and the five risks that likely pushed AI companies to draw the line.
Open-Source AI Text-to-Speech Models You Can Run Locally That Sound Realistic

5 Open-Source AI Text-to-Speech Generators You Can Run Locally for Natural, Human-Like Voice

0
If you’re creating content or building products then relying entirely on cloud APIs isn’t your only option anymore. Open-source text-to-speech models have improved dramatically. Some now produce voices that sound surprisingly natural with lower long-term cost, and full ownership over your deployment. If you’re generating narration for YouTube, building an AI assistant, or integrating voice into your next app, running a powerful TTS model locally can give you flexibility the cloud simply can’t. Here are five open-source AI voice models worth knowing.
Best AI Music Generators That Create Studio-Quality Songs

5 Open-Source AI Music Generators That Create Studio-Quality Songs

0
Most AI music generators live in the cloud now. you generate a Song, download the file, & hope your credits don’t run out next week. It’s convenient but what if the pricing changes or the model gets restricted? you’re back to square one. I wanted to see what happens if you flip that around. So I spent some time running open-source music models locally. Just a GPU, some patience, and a lot of test prompts. The results surprised me. A couple of these models are genuinely impressive. I mean tracks with structure, transitions, and a level of realism that matches Studio level Music. Others in the list are more experimental. You’ll hear rough edges. Sometimes the mix feels flat or composition drifts. I’m including them anyway because they do one or two things really well, and because they’re open. You can inspect them, tweak them, fine-tune them, and build on top of them. If you’ve got a decent GPU even something in the 6–12GB range, you can run at least some of these yourself. So this isn’t a list for someone who just wants a quick background track for Instagram. It’s for builders, Producers & Developers who are curious what’s possible when the model is actually sitting on their own machine. Let’s get into the ones that are worth your time

Don’t miss any Tech Story

Subscribe To Firethering NewsLetter

You Can Unsubscribe Anytime! Read more in our privacy policy