back to top
HomeTechDuckDuckGo Installs Jumped 30% as Frustration With Google’s AI Search Grew

DuckDuckGo Installs Jumped 30% as Frustration With Google’s AI Search Grew

DuckDuckGo Installs Jumped 30% as Frustration With Google’s AI Search Grew
Mohit Geryani
By Mohit Geryani
3
Last updated:
- Advertisement -

People on Reddit and X are calling it something beyond enshittification. One user put it simply: “Google basically just ruined the old ten blue links era.” Another said Google is “abusing its status as infrastructure to weasel its AI into consumers’ day-to-day.” That’s the actual audience reaction.

According to TechCrunch, the week after Google announced it was replacing its traditional search results with an AI agent that answers queries, executes tasks, and runs background monitoring, DuckDuckGo saw US app installs jump 18.1% week over week on average. It peaked at 30.5% on May 25. On iOS the numbers were sharper, week over week growth hit 33% on average and peaked at 69.9%. The company also said growth held through the Memorial Day weekend, when it usually sees a dip.

DuckDuckGo has been stuck at around 2% of the US search market for years. One Google I/O announcement moved its install numbers more than anything DuckDuckGo has done on its own.

What Google changed

At I/O, Google said the familiar list of blue links is going away. In its place is an AI agent that handles queries end to end, with background monitoring agents running alongside. The company framed it as the future of search.

Users framed it differently. The complaint isn’t that AI is involved. It’s that there’s no way to opt out. Google’s AI overviews appear whether you want them or not, surface inaccurate responses often enough to erode trust, and complicate searches that used to be simple. Someone tried searching the word “disregard” and got an AI-generated mess instead of results.

DuckDuckGo CEO Gabriel Weinberg put it directly: “Google is force-feeding AI with no way to opt out. As a result their results are getting worse, not better.”

That framing is doing actual work for DuckDuckGo right now. The opt-out argument is simple, easy to understand, and lands cleanly against Google’s all-in approach. It doesn’t require users to care about privacy or antitrust or open web economics. It just requires them to be annoyed, and a lot of them are.

The numbers and what they actually mean

DuckDuckGo’s AI-free search page, noai.duckduckgo.com, averaged 22.7% week over week growth during the same period, peaking at 27.7% on May 24. That page strips every AI feature by default, no AI assisted answers, no AI generated images. The fact that it’s growing faster than general installs suggests users aren’t just downloading DuckDuckGo out of curiosity. They’re specifically looking for the AI-off experience.

What those numbers don’t change is the baseline. DuckDuckGo is growing from 2% of the US search market. A 30% install spike on a small base is meaningful momentum but it’s not a threat to Google’s position this week or next month. The more interesting question is whether these are protest installs that quietly get abandoned when habits reassert themselves, or whether Google’s changes are disruptive enough that some percentage of these users actually stick.

The Memorial Day data point is the one worth watching. DuckDuckGo said it usually sees a traffic dip over the holiday weekend and didn’t this time. If the growth is holding through a period that historically softens it, that’s a signal the shift has some durability behind it.

You May Like: Microsoft and Uber Are Running Into an AI Cost Problem

The irony of DuckDuckGo’s AI product

The opt-out argument is working. What makes it interesting is that DuckDuckGo isn’t actually anti-AI. It has its own AI product called Duck.ai, free, no account required, with access to Claude 4.5 Haiku, Llama 4 Scout, Mistral Small 3, and GPT-5 mini. All chats are private, IP addresses stripped before requests reach model providers, conversations deleted within 30 days, nothing used for training.

It also offers Search Assist, similar to Google’s AI overviews, and an AI Image Filter that removes AI-generated images from results. Both are reportedly among DuckDuckGo’s most popular features despite sitting on opposite ends of the AI preference spectrum.

The difference isn’t that DuckDuckGo is against AI. It’s that everything is optional. You choose how much AI you want. Google made that choice for you. That’s the gap DuckDuckGo is exploiting right now and CEO Gabriel Weinberg knows it. “People just want a choice,” his communications chief said. That’s it. That’s the whole pitch.

Whether any of this sticks

A 30% install spike from a 2% market share base is momentum, not a shift. The real question is how many of these installs survive the first week when muscle memory kicks in and fingers type google.com anyway.

The Memorial Day data suggests at least some durability. Growth held through a weekend that historically softens DuckDuckGo’s numbers.

What Google has done is hand a real argument to every alternative search engine that was struggling to articulate why anyone should switch. Privacy wasn’t enough. Speed wasn’t enough. The forced AI overhaul gave DuckDuckGo something it couldn’t manufacture on its own: a reason that feels personal to ordinary users who just wanted to search for something and got an AI agent instead.

Whether that translates into lasting market share is a different question. But for the first time in a long time DuckDuckGo doesn’t have to explain why it exists. Google did that for them.

Want more stories worth your time?

Add us to your Google favorites. We cover the tech stories, AI developments, and open-source projects that are easy to miss in the noise.

Add as a preferred source on Google

Don’t miss any Tech Story

Subscribe To Firethering NewsLetter

You Can Unsubscribe Anytime! Read more in our privacy policy

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Inside Sam Altman’s High-Stakes Gamble to Save OpenAI’s Dominance

“Mostly My Fault”: Inside Sam Altman’s High-Stakes Gamble to Save OpenAI’s Dominance

Mohit Geryani - 0
It’s been a little over a month since Sam Altman admitted something you don't often hear from the CEO of the company that helped kick off the generative AI boom. “We did not have our best last 12 months ever, which is mostly my fault.” Then he raised the stakes. Altman said OpenAI is about to have its best 12 months to date. A month later, that promise is worth looking at more closely because OpenAI isn't simply trying to release a better model. It's spending enormous amounts of money on compute, pushing deeper into AI agents and products, competing with increasingly capable rivals, and making bets on infrastructure that could shape how the company operates for years. So what changed? And more importantly, what exactly is Altman betting on to turn a year he largely blames himself for into OpenAI's best one yet?
GrapheneOS Is Coming to Motorola: Why It Needed Pixel Hardware First

To Escape Google, You Had to Buy a Pixel. Motorola Is About to Change...

Mohit Geryani - 0
For years, there was a strange contradiction at the heart of one of Android’s most privacy-focused alternatives: if you wanted to get away from Google’s software, you generally had to buy a Google phone. GrapheneOS has largely been tied to the Pixel because Google’s hardware has provided the security features the project needs to build its hardened version of Android. It was an engineering compromise, not exactly an endorsement of the Google ecosystem. Now, that compromise may finally be ending. Motorola and the GrapheneOS project are working together on a new generation of Motorola phones that are expected to support GrapheneOS in 2027. For the first time, the project is preparing to expand beyond Pixel hardware with support from another major smartphone maker. That sounds like a simple hardware partnership. It isn't. Because getting GrapheneOS onto another phone isn't as easy as installing a different operating system. The hardware underneath has to meet a demanding set of security requirements and that creates an unexpected problem for anyone hoping for a cheap, privacy-focused phone.
Cursor Origin Doesn’t Want to Replace GitHub yet

Cursor Origin Doesn’t Want to Replace GitHub. (Yet.)

Mohit Geryani - 0
For years, GitHub was the boring part of software development. Developers wrote code, opened a pull request, waited for review, merged it, and moved on. The system was built around a fairly simple assumption: a human was creating most of the work. That workflow starts to look a little different when your coding assistant can work on multiple tasks, generate changes and open pull requests while you're doing something else. Cursor seems to be betting that this is going to change more than just how developers write code. The company just launched Origin, its own code-hosting platform, bringing repositories, pull requests and Cursor's AI agents into the same environment. Then, almost immediately, GitHub had a major outage. The timing made for an easy headline: Cursor launches a GitHub competitor as GitHub goes down. But that's not really what matters. GitHub came back up. What matters is why Cursor is moving into code hosting at all and what it sees changing as AI agents become a much bigger part of software development. Because Origin isn't really about giving developers another place to store their Git repositories.